Schulich logo The word Schulich Schulich Wordmark The word Schulich with the words Leading Change Schulich Logo The Schulich logo Schulich 50th Logo The number 50 Search An icon depicting a magnifying glass Envelope An icon depicting an envelope Phone An icon depicting a phone Fax An icon depicting a fax machine Map Pin An icon depicting a map pin People An icon depicting two people Graduation Cap An icon depicting a graduation cap Menu An icon depicting three lines Close An icon depicting an X Arrow Up An icon depicting an upward facing arrow Arrow Right An icon depicting a right facing arrow Arrow Down An icon depicting a downward facing arrow Arrow Left An icon depicting a left facing arrow Plus An icon depicting a plus sign Minus An icon depicting a minus sign Chart An icon depicting a chart Book An icon depicting a book Envelope An icon depicting a stamped envelope Dollar Sign An icon depicting a dollar sign Briefcase An icon depicting a briefcase Page An icon depicting a single page Share An icon depicting three connected dots Alert An icon depicting a triangle with an exclamation point Calendar An icon depicting a blank calendar Event An icon depicting a blank calendar Add Event An icon depicting a calendar with a plus sign on it Event Details An icon depicting a calendar with a question mark on it Print An icon depicting a printer Comment An icon depicting a speech bubble Feed The RSS icon Details An icon depicting a page with three lines of text Facebook An icon depicting the Facebook logo Twitter An icon depicting the Twitter logo YouTube An icon depicting the YouTube logo LinkedIn An icon depicting the LinkedIn logo Instagram An icon depicting the Instagram logo Long Arrow Left An icon depicting an arrow pointing left Long Arrow Down An icon depicting an arrow pointing down Flexible Study Options An icon depicting a branching line Awards An icon depicting a ribbon Advisory Board An icon depicting a round table Graduate Diploma An icon depicting a graduation cap Professional Designations An icon depicting a certificate Academics An icon depicting an academic building Schulich Logo The Schulich logo Academics An icon depicting an academic building Globe An icon depicting the globe with an arrow circling it Globe An icon depicting the globe with an arrow circling it Award Ribbon An icon depicting a ribbon Teacher An icon depicting a teacher pointing at a blackboard Double Location An icon depicting two location pins Wireframe Globe An icon depicting a wireframe globe Airplane An icon depicting an airplane Play Icon in the shape of a play button as found on videos Full-time Icon representing a full-time program Part-time Icon representing a part-time program Full-time Accelerated Icon representing a full-time accelerated program Part-time Accelerated Icon representing a part-time accelerated program Program Details Icon representing program details Program Tuition Icon representing tuition and fees Career Opportunities Icon representing program details Accreditations Icon representing program accreditations Program Options Icon representing program options Requirements Icon representing program requirements Courses and Electives Icon representing program courses Faculty Icon representing program faculty Clubs Icon representing program clubs Courthouse Icon representing a courthouse Oil Icon representing an oil droplet Retail Icon representing a shopping bag Food Icon representing a fork and knife Construction Icon representing a hammer and wrench Person A silhouette of a person Person An outline of a person Folder An outline of a folder Pie chart An outline of a pie chart Graph An outline of a bar graph Save An arrow pointing into a box Play An outline of a play arrow Key An outline of a key Ticket An outline of a ticket Books Two books Computer A laptop computer Globe An outline of a globe Plane An outline of a plane Accelerated Program An outline of a fast-forward button Part-time Program An arrow arcing around a clock Viewbook An outline of an open book Medal A medal with a star Professor A lecturing professor Suit A person wearing a suit Laptop Laptop computer (by FlatIcon) Locked Closed Access Unlocked Open Access Google Scholar Google Scholar icon Calendar An icon depicting a blank calendar Skip to content

Matt Bamber

  • Future Students
  • Current Students
    Undergraduate Students ›Graduate Students ›
     › › › ›
  • Alumni
    • Mentorship & Volunteering ›

      Alumni Benefits ›

      Success Stories ›

      Common Questions ›

      Contact Alumni Relations ›

    • Alumni Events ›

      Global Alumni Chapters ›

      Alumni Services for Students ›

      Alumni Recognition Awards ›

    Overview ›Alumni Career Portal ›Online Community ›
     › › › ›
  • Donors
    • Ways to Support ›

      The Impact of Giving ›

      Sponsorship Opportunities ›

      Leaving a Legacy to Schulich ›

      Contact Development Office ›

    • Schulich Priorities ›

      The Schulich Annual Fund ›

      The Dean’s Society ›

      Tribute Giving ›

    Overview ›Donate Now ›
     › › › ›
  • Recruiters
  • Media
MySchulich
Schulich School of Business
  • Future Students
  • Current Students
    Undergraduate Students ›Graduate Students ›
     › › › ›
  • Alumni
    • Mentorship & Volunteering ›

      Alumni Benefits ›

      Success Stories ›

      Common Questions ›

      Contact Alumni Relations ›

    • Alumni Events ›

      Global Alumni Chapters ›

      Alumni Services for Students ›

      Alumni Recognition Awards ›

    Overview ›Alumni Career Portal ›Online Community ›
     › › › ›
  • Donors
    • Ways to Support ›

      The Impact of Giving ›

      Sponsorship Opportunities ›

      Leaving a Legacy to Schulich ›

      Contact Development Office ›

    • Schulich Priorities ›

      The Schulich Annual Fund ›

      The Dean’s Society ›

      Tribute Giving ›

    Overview ›Donate Now ›
     › › › ›
  • Recruiters
  • Media
  • Programs
    & Courses
    • Program Finder ›
    • 5-Minute Suitability Questionnaire ›
    • Undergraduate

      BBA ›
      iBBA ›

      Specialized Masters Programs

      Accounting ›
      Artificial Intelligence ›
      Business Analytics ›
      Finance ›
      Management ›
      Marketing ›
      Real Estate & Infrastructure ›
      Supply Chain Management ›

    • Master of Business Administration

      MBA ›
      MBA in India ›
      MBA / Juris Doctor ›
      MBA / MFA / MA ›
      Kellogg-Schulich Executive MBA ›

      Exchange

      Incoming Exchange and Programs ›

    • Graduate Diplomas

      Post-MBA Diploma in Advanced Management ›
      Intermediate Accounting ›

      Doctor of Philosophy

      PhD in Administration ›

     › › › ›
  • Admissions
    • Undergraduate

      Apply Now ›
      Admissions FAQs ›
      Connect With Us ›
      Meet the Team ›

    • Graduate

      Apply Now ›

      Tuition Fees & Costs ›

      Application Tips ›

      Connect with Us ›

      Admission Events ›

      Meet the Team ›

    Admissions Requirements ›
     › › › ›
  • Faculty
    & Research
  • Student Life
    & Services
    • Case Competition Program ›
      Centre for Career Design ›
      Event Calendar ›
      Financial Aid ›

    • International Relations ›
      Libraries ›
      Services for Students ›
      Student Life at Schulich ›

     › › › ›
  • About
    • Our Dean ›

      Rankings ›

      Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Working Group ›

      Case Competition Program ›

      Schulich Startups ›

      Year-End Report ›

      News & Events ›

      Contact Directory ›

    • Our Heritage ›

      Recruit at Schulich ›

      Work at Schulich ›

      Hospitality & Hotel Services ›

    Learn more about Schulich ›
     › › › ›
  • Executive
    MBA
    • Program Information

      Overview ›

      Program Details ›

      Schedule & Courses ›

    • Admission Requirements ›

      Tuition Fees ›

    Are you EMBA ready? ›Request a pre-assessment ›

     

    Contact us at 416-736-5486 or emba@schulich.yorku.ca​

     › › › ›
  • Executive
    Education
  • MySchulich

Faculty & Research

Matt Bamber

Matt Bamber

Associate Professor of Accounting

mbamber@schulich.yorku.ca

(416) 736 - 2100 ext. 77949

Office: S339

  • Area of Expertise

    • Accounting ›

    Research Interests

    • Higher Education
    • Identity
    • Investor-Manager Meetings
    • Performance Measures
    • Qualitative Methods
    • Sociology of Financial Reporting
    Download CV
  • Matt is an Associate Professor of Accounting. He originally trained as a Chartered Accountant (ICAEW; FCA), gaining practical experience in audit and corporate finance in the UK and the US. In 2004, he made the transition from practice to higher education. Before joining Schulich School of Business in 2018, Matt held appointments at the Universities of Bristol (UK) and University of Toronto (Canada). Matt’s current research sub-divides into two branches. First, he is interested in the sociology of financial reporting, drawing on theories of performance, identity, and surveillance. Second, Matt’s work focuses on improving awareness of the challenges facing workers who are marginalized, stigmatized, and overlooked. His particular focus is on investor-manager interactions, and specifically Question and Answer sessions. He has published his work in a number of high ranked academic journals including Contemporary Accounting Research, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Work, Employment and Society, and Human Relations.

    Honours

    2017/18 Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto: Teaching Award MBA

    2017/18 Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto: Teaching Award Undergraduate

    2013 University of Bristol: Dean’s Award for Education Excellence

    Recent Publications

    Bamber, M., McCormack, J. and Lyons, B.J. (2021), "Conceptualizing Within-group Stigmatisation’ Among High-status Workers", Work, Employment and Society.

    Keywords
    • Occupational Stigma
    • Organisational (dis)identification
    • Within-Group Stigma

    Open Access Download

    Abstract

    This article explores the identity challenges facing teaching-only faculty (TOF), whose occupational self-perceptions are fundamentally contradicted by the way institutional others perceive them. We show how this manifests into a set of stigmatising practices and processes across two dimensions: contact (informal messaging) and contract (formal messaging). The sense of being unjustly stigmatised is amplified because the teaching-only role is generally seen as high-status by outsiders, and the work itself is relatively free from real or metaphorical dirt. Hence, we propose the concept of within-group stigmatisation. Next, we shine light on the implications of this form of occupational stigmatisation through the lens of organisational (dis)identification. In contrast to theoretical expectations, the analysis of our extensive survey and interview data shows that TOF identify with their role but disidentify with the organisation. Finally, we reflect on the importance and broader applicability of our concept of within-group occupational stigmatisation.

    Abraham, S. and Bamber, M. (2020), "On the “Realities” of Investor-Manager Interactivity: Baudrillard, Hyperreality, and Management Q&A Sessions", Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1290-1325.

    View Paper

    Abstract

    This paper draws on extensive fieldwork to explore the nature, scope, and implications of management preparations for the question and answer session (Q&A) that occurs during a firm’s results presentation. Prior literature has associated the value of this encounter with investor‐manager interactivity. As such, it is assumed that there are high levels of managerial authorship, ownership, and spontaneity as executives face questions from analysts. Following on, it is generally assumed that this translates into an increased risk of unintended disclosure, through verbal and nonverbal messaging. However, our data indicate that management engages in vast preparatory work to mitigate the risks associated with real (“original,” natural, spontaneous, un‐staged) interactivity. Instead, the Q&A is carefully planned, organized, scripted, and rehearsed. As such, the event is transformed into a hyperreal encounter in the Baudrillardian sense. Despite this, the value of the Q&A is not necessarily impaired. Instead, these managerial backstage preparations arguably make the encounter realer than real. We suggest that the Q&A that we observe (the “copy”) is more useful than the original might have been. Our work provides evidence and discussion of two interconnected paradoxes: perfection and self‐reference. This study not only raises important questions, challenges, and opportunities for researchers interested in the study of investor‐manager interactions but also speaks to those with an interest in workplace meetings and Q&A more broadly.

    Bamber, M. (2019), "A New World Order for the Beer Industry: A Review of the Acquisition of SABMiller by Anheuser‐Busch AB InBev.", Accounting Perspectives, 18(2), 117-131.

    View Paper

    Abstract

    This case study reviews one of the largest merger and acquisition transactions in corporate history—the acquisition of SABMiller by Anheuser‐Busch InBev. This study provides information to value the post‐transaction combined entity and provide an investment recommendation. Following this, the case discusses the basic details of the funding required to undertake the acquisition and questions which implications of any additional financial risk may arise for AB InBev from a valuation perspective.

    Abraham, S., Bamber, M., Elshandidy, T. and Shrives, P.J. (2018), "Risk Reporting: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Future Research", Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, 54-82.

    Keywords
    • Mandatory and Voluntary Risk Reporting
    • Manual and Automated Content Analysis
    • Risk-reporting Incentives and Informativeness

    Open Access Download

    Abstract

    This paper provides a wide-ranging and up-to-date (1997–2016) review of the archival empirical risk-reporting literature. The reviewed papers are classified into two principal themes: the incentives for and/or informativeness of risk reporting. Our review demonstrates areas of significant divergence in the literature specifically: mandatory versus voluntary risk reporting, manual versus automated content analysis, within-country versus cross-country variations in risk reporting, and risk reporting in financial versus non-financial firms. Our paper identifies a number of issues which require further research. In particular we draw attention to two: first, a lack of clarity and consistency around the conceptualization of risk; and second, the potential costs and benefits of standard-setters’ involvement.

    Bamber, M., McMeeking, K. and Petrovic, N. (2018), "Mandatory Financial Reporting Processes and Outcomes", The International Journal of Accounting, 53(2), 227-245.

    Keywords
    • Applicability
    • Audit Fees
    • Compliance
    • Financial Instruments
    • Financial Reporting
    • Quantity

    Open Access Download

    Abstract

    In an extension to the mandatory financial reporting literature, we consider compliance and applicability as intermediate stages in the disclosure decision process, and investigate to what extent these measures explain any variance in the quantity of disclosure. We use financial instruments disclosures as our empirical context because of the level of complexity and diversity of the mandatory requirements. We find that neither applicability nor compliance show statistically significant association with disclosure quantity. By contrast we find that a firm’s financial instruments management programme is an important determinant of both applicability and quantity. Finally, we demonstrate the economic consequences of applicability, compliance and quantity through their association with audit fees. For companies that use financial instruments management programmes to a greater extent, audit fees are higher. In contrast, the quantity of financial instruments disclosures appears to reduce audit fees.

    Abraham, S. and Bamber, M. (2017), "The Q&A: Under Surveillance", Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 15-31.

    Keywords
    • Impression Management
    • Interaction ritual
    • Performance
    • Presentations
    • Q&A
    • Qualitative Research
    • Results
    • Surveillance

    Open Access Download

    Abstract

    Drawing on theories of surveillance and interaction ritual, we explore the incentives (disincentives) to analyst participation during the question-and-answer session (Q&A) which concludes firms’ results presentations. Analysis of our qualitative data shows that interrogation strategies and behaviours are influenced by a combination of regulatory and ritual codes. Furthermore, the presence of surveillance technologies and networks exacerbate the risks and rewards faced by analysts during this interactive information exchange. In turn, we find that the common conceptualisation of the Q&A as an ostensibly economic event, underpinned by information retrieval, is overly simplistic. The gaze of surveillance transforms the Q&A into a dramaturgical encounter, where impression management techniques are important. From this, we develop a descriptive framework to explain public interrogation strategies and behaviours. Our work will help future researchers better understand investor-manager meetings. Furthermore, we propose that our descriptive framework has extensions to similar public interrogation settings.

    Allen-Collinson, J., Bamber, M. and McCormack, J. (2017), "Occupational Limbo, Transitional Liminality and Permanent Liminality: New Conceptual Distinctions", Human Relations, 70(12), 1514-1537.

    Keywords
    • Academic Careers
    • Limbo
    • Liminality
    • Organizational Theory
    • Work Environment

    Open Access Download

    Abstract

    This article contributes new theoretical perspectives and empirical findings to the conceptualization of occupational liminality. Here, we posit ‘occupational limbo’ as a state distinct from both transitional and permanent liminality; an important analytic distinction in better understanding occupational experiences. In its anthropological sense, liminality refers to a state of being betwixt and between; it is temporary and transitional. Permanent liminality refers to a state of being neither-this-nor-that, or both-this-and-that. We extend this framework in proposing a conceptualization of occupational limbo as always-this-and-never-that, where this is less desirable than that. Based on interviews with 51 teaching-only staff at 20 research-intensive ‘Russell Group’ universities in the United Kingdom, the findings highlight some challenging occupational experiences. Interviewees reported feeling ‘locked-in’ to an uncomfortable state by a set of structural and social barriers often perceived as insurmountable. Teaching-only staff were found to engage in negative and often self-depreciatory identity talk that highlighted a felt inability to cross the līmen to the elevated status of ‘proper academics’. The research findings and the new conceptual framework provide analytic insights with wider application to other occupational spheres, and can thus enhance the understanding not just of teaching-only staff and academics, but also of other workers and managers.

    Bamber, M. (2017), "Market-Risk Disclosures: The Initiation and Implementation of a Financial Reporting Innovation", Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 20, 159-188.

    Keywords
    • Compliance
    • Financial Instruments
    • Innocation-diffusion
    • Mandatory Market-risk Disclosures
    • Standard-setting

    View Paper

    Abstract

    Recognizing that disclosure choices are not made in political and social vacuums, this study suggests that sociological perspectives such as innovation-diffusion inform a theory of compliance.

    Bamber, M. and McMeeking, K. (2016), "An Examination of International Accounting Standard-Setting Due Process and the Implications for Legitimacy", The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 59-73.

    Keywords
    • Legitimacy
    • Standard-setting

    Open Access Download

    Abstract

    This paper explores the due process of accounting standard-setting by focussing on relative levels of stakeholder and jurisdictional influence. We draw on legitimacy theory to explain our findings and ask what implications any bias might have for the IASB. This study extends the standard-setting literature in three ways. First, we create a weighted coding system to analyse the content of comment letters. Second, we test for differences in the acceptance rate of comments made by stakeholders and by jurisdictions. Third, we analyse IASB discussion documentation that sheds light on the decision-making process. Previous studies have focused on whether outcome-oriented proposals are ‘influential’ (persuasive) by focussing on success rates measured as proposed changes being accepted. We widen this definition to include whether constituents’ views are discussed. We find that accounting firms appear to have significantly less influence than other stakeholders. We also find that the IASB reacts less favourably to UK proposals but comments from the US are more likely to be discussed. A lack of fairness (real or perceived) could jeopardise perceptions of the procedural legitimacy of the due process and ultimately impair the IASB’s cognitive legitimacy.

    Bamber, M. and Parry, S. (2016), "A Study of the Employment of Denial During a Complex and Unstable Crisis Involving Multiple Actors", International Journal of Business Communication, 53(3), 343-366.

    Keywords
    • Crisis Communication
    • Denial
    • Press Releases

    View Paper

    Abstract

    The authors review the use of denial through a complex and unstable crisis: the Deepwater Horizon tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico. Denial is typically viewed as a binary response—”we did not do this”—with a binary intended outcome—”and therefore we are not to blame.” The authors argue that this interpretation is overly simplistic. They found that Transocean and Halliburton executed a strategy consisting of distancing and (counter)attack to shift blame, whereas BP pursued a strategy dominated by compassion and ingratiation intermixed with carefully used denial to share blame. This form of blame sharing is a hybrid of denial and acceptance. BP accepted responsibility but argued that others were responsible too. The authors’ analysis also shows that deny response options were restricted or relaxed dependent on situational and intertextual context. They find that the tone of the involved parties’ releases became significantly more aggressive as the situation developed toward its legal conclusion and as they responded to one another’s progressively more hostile releases.

    Bamber, M. (2015), "The Impact on Stakeholder Confidence of Increased Transparency in the Examination Assessment Process", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 471-487.

    Keywords
    • Assessment Process
    • Examination Marking
    • Transparency

    View Paper

    Abstract

    A group of postgraduate accounting and finance students were asked to participate in a three-phase exercise: sit an unseen past examination question; mark a fully anonymised previous student solution (exemplar); and then mark their own work. The marking process was facilitated by explaining and discussing the marking guide, assessment systems and process, and grade descriptors. Levels of marking accuracy significantly improved through the phases of the exercise, demonstrating a calibration of standards. Students’ perceptions of the exercise were explored via questionnaires and focus groups. Respondents gave a strong indication that the exercise was useful and identified several learning benefits. The introduction of transparency was found to contribute towards increased stakeholder confidence in the rigour and robustness of assessment systems and processes. It also made participants less cynical about marking veracity and integrity. Another consequence of this increased transparency was that while some concerns were alleviated, others emerged. Through this exercise, students came to understand some of the difficulties assessors face when completing examination setting and marking exercises.

    Bamber, M. (2014), "What Motivates Chinese Women to Study in the UK and How Do They Perceive Their Experience", Higher Education, 68(1), 47-68.

    Keywords
    • International Students
    • Postgraduate UK Higher Education

    View Paper

    Abstract

    This paper addresses two crucial questions facing the UK HE sector: what motivates female Chinese globally mobile graduates to continue their education in the UK?; and, are they satisfied with their experience? First, this mixed methods study revealed that the primary motivations were: early and mid-career gains, competitive advantages derived from completing a 1-year master’s programme, favourable exchange rates, and the opportunity to travel. Alongside these, a number of challenges and concerns were also noted, including: high UK tuition fees and living costs, shifting Chinese employer perceptions of an overseas education, and punitive UK visa regulations. Second, findings indicated mid- to high levels of satisfaction with the experience. Students believed that the main strengths and benefits of a UK-based education related to the high levels of tutorial participation and interaction which facilitated increased subject-matter engagement, as well as to the development of interpretation and application skills. Nevertheless, respondents reported that there are many ways in which we need to improve, such as by: offering clearer language guidance, closing the assessment requirements expectations gap, offering more opportunities for classroom participation, cutting class sizes, reducing fees, and ironically, attracting students from geographical zones other than China to facilitate academic development and programme diversity.

    Grants

    Project Title Role Award Amount Year Awarded Granting Agency
    Project TitleAccounting Interrogations: Good Questions, Good Answers, and the Roles of Voice and Silence RolePrincipal Investigator Award Amount$125,290.00 Year Awarded2019-2024 Granting AgencySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
    Project TitleWidening Participation Projects Funding (with McCormack, J.) Role Award Amount$8,000.00 Year Awarded2012/13 Granting AgencyUniversity of Bristol
  • Schulich - York University
    • Directions
    • Location Inquiries
    • Contact Directory
    • Event Calendar
    • MySchulich
  • Information for:

    • Future Students
    • Current Students Undergraduate
    • Current Students Graduate
    • Alumni
    • Donors
    • Recruiters
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Media
  • Go to:

    • About
    • Admissions
    • Faculty Listing
    • Student Life at Schulich
    • Services for Students
    • Wellness Suite
    • Privacy
    • Site Map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

© Copyright 2022 The Schulich School of Business, York University.