Publications Database
Welcome to the new Schulich Peer-Reviewed Publication Database!
The database is currently in beta-testing and will be updated with more features as time goes on. In the meantime, stakeholders are free to explore our faculty’s numerous works. The left-hand panel affords the ability to search by the following:
- Faculty Member’s Name;
- Area of Expertise;
- Whether the Publication is Open-Access (free for public download);
- Journal Name; and
- Date Range.
At present, the database covers publications from 2012 to 2020, but will extend further back in the future. In addition to listing publications, the database includes two types of impact metrics: Altmetrics and Plum. The database will be updated annually with most recent publications from our faculty.
If you have any questions or input, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Search Results
Yimeng Li, Sylvia H. Hsu, Rong Wang, Poy Theprungsirikul, Natalia Neparidze, Su-Hsin Chang and Shi-Yi Wang (Forthcoming). "Associations Between Patient Characteristics and Progression to Multiple Myeloma Among Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Systematic Review", Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia.
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a pre-malignant condition of multiple myeloma (MM). Evidence suggested old age, black race, male gender, and obesity as risk factors for MGUS development; however, whether they are associated with an increased risk of progression to MM among patients with MGUS is unclear. A systematic search of PUBMED and EMBASE for cohort studies investigating the association between age/race/gender/obesity and progression to MM. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess the methodologic quality of the included studies. Summary risk ratios were calculated using random-effects models. We identified 24 publications, of which 17 articles were included in the main analyses. Overall, the quality of the studies was fair (mean NOS = 5.5). Our meta-analyses showed that old age was positively associated with the risk of the MGUS-MM progression (risk ratio: 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-3.57), while race was not statistically significantly associated with the risk (blacks vs whites: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.77-1.54). Males had a lower risk of MGUS-MM progression, compared to females (risk ratio: 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-1.0; P-value = .048). High body mass index was significantly associated with an increased risk of MGUS-MM progression (risk ratio: 1.32; 95% CI 1.12-1.57). Based on extant research, old age, female sex, and obesity may be implicated in MGUS-MM progression. However, several studies which found an insignificant association between age/gender and progression did not report the risk estimates. Publication bias exists and our risk estimates may be overestimated. More studies are warranted to confirm our findings.Winny Shen, D. Ramona Bobocel and Joel Becker (2024). "Intersectional Penalties for Perceived Interpersonal Justice Violations among Black and Hispanic Male Leaders in the Workplace", Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-21.
Abstract
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has drawn attention to the lack of progress toward racial equity in many domains. Chief among them is the unequal treatment that Black men often face when interacting with law enforcement or within the criminal justice system, which appears heavily associated with the pernicious stereotype that Black men are distinctly aggressive and dangerous. Evidence suggests that Hispanic men are also subject to similar negative stereotypes. We contend that the consequences of this intersectional stereotype are wide-ranging and explore how it manifests and continues to shape the experiences of Black and Hispanic men in contemporary work organizations. Across two field studies surveying employees supervised by a diverse set of leaders, we find evidence that leaders’ intersectional identities moderate the relationship between interpersonal injustice and leader evaluations (i.e., performance ratings, reward recommendations) and relational outcomes (i.e., supervisor-directed organizational citizenship behaviors), such that Black or Hispanic men are penalized more severely for violations of interpersonal justice relative to White men as well as Black or Hispanic women. Additionally, this unequal response across leaders is because subordinates find such aggressive actions less acceptable for Black or Hispanic men, as it violates societal proscriptions surrounding for whom aggressive behaviors are deemed acceptable, rather than due to greater fear associated with the content of this negative stereotype.Annisette, M. and Prasad, A. (2017). "Critical Accounting Research in Hyper-Racial Times", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 5-19.
Abstract
The paper expresses deep concern for the paucity of critical accounting scholarship in the contemporary period that can only be deemed hyper-racial (Alim and Reyes, 2011). By reflecting on how the concept of race has been mobilized in the critical accounting literature, we identify the contours of extant accounting research on race and we discuss the pitfalls and the challenges of pursuing scholarship in this area. In addition, we develop a framework for future research on race and accounting aimed at rendering our efforts more impactful and more subversive in challenging contemporary systems and practices of inequality based on race.Beatty, A.S., Higdem, J.L., Kiger, T.B., Kostal, J.W., Kiger, T.B., Sackett, P.R. and Shen, W. (2016). "The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35, 21-28.