Publications Database

Welcome to the new Schulich Peer-Reviewed Publication Database!

The database is currently in beta-testing and will be updated with more features as time goes on. In the meantime, stakeholders are free to explore our faculty’s numerous works. The left-hand panel affords the ability to search by the following:

  • Faculty Member’s Name;
  • Area of Expertise;
  • Whether the Publication is Open-Access (free for public download);
  • Journal Name; and
  • Date Range.

At present, the database covers publications from 2012 to 2020, but will extend further back in the future. In addition to listing publications, the database includes two types of impact metrics: Altmetrics and Plum. The database will be updated annually with most recent publications from our faculty.

If you have any questions or input, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.

 

Search Results

Tan, J., Wang, L., Zhang, H., and Li, W. (2020). "Disruptive Innovation and Technology Ecosystem: The Evolution of the Intercohesive Public-private Collaboration Network in Chinese Telecommunication Industry", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 57, 101573.

View Paper

Keywords
Abstract Recent events involving Chinese technology firm Huawei and its role in the global 5th Generation (5G) telecommunication standard, as well as the role of the Chinese government in shaping the technology competition, have pushed the issue of public–private collaboration to the headline. To offer improved understanding about this issue of profound implication for research and practice, we trace the trajectory of a previous public–private collaboration and investigates the disruption and restructure of a technology ecosystem. The standardization of China’s TD-SCDMA technology reveals that (1) a network has a more centralized structure at its inception; (2) intercohesion increases and structural folds facilitate knowledge generation and disruptive innovation in the orchestration phase; (3) in the embedded phase, the public institutions’ status generally remained stable. Essentially, the government empowers various institutions to form a strategizing group, and leads this group across the disruption and reconfiguration of the industrial network.