Publications Database

Welcome to the new Schulich Peer-Reviewed Publication Database!

The database is currently in beta-testing and will be updated with more features as time goes on. In the meantime, stakeholders are free to explore our faculty’s numerous works. The left-hand panel affords the ability to search by the following:

  • Faculty Member’s Name;
  • Area of Expertise;
  • Whether the Publication is Open-Access (free for public download);
  • Journal Name; and
  • Date Range.

At present, the database covers publications from 2012 to 2020, but will extend further back in the future. In addition to listing publications, the database includes two types of impact metrics: Altmetrics and Plum. The database will be updated annually with most recent publications from our faculty.

If you have any questions or input, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.

 

Search Results

Leslie Berger, Linda Thorne, Sara Wick (2025). "Revue de la Littérature sur les Programmes de Dénonciation Fiscale", Éthique publique, 27(1-2).

Open Access Download

Keywords
Abstract Whistleblowing programs encourage the disclosure of illegal, immoral or illegitimate practices to appropriate authorities and have been shown to have success in encouraging the exposure of fraud in organizations. Tax whistleblowing programs have been increasingly adopted by national tax authorities in an effort to combate aggressive tax behavior. Due to the growth in popularity of these programs, the identification of factors that affect the efficacy of tax whistleblowing programs is key as well as our development of an understanding of the areas in which research into tax whistleblowing programs remains to be explored. Accordingly, we conduct a review of the tax whistleblowing literature to consider the existing research on tax whistleblowing programs and to identify which factors of tax whistleblowing programs are yet to be explored.

Cannatelli, B., Kistruck, G. and Smith, B.R. (2016). "The Impact of Moral Intensity and Desire for Control on Scaling Decisions in Social Entrepreneurship", Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 677-689.

View Paper

Keywords
Abstract
While research has focused on why certain entrepreneurs elect to create innovative solutions to social problems, very little is known about why some social entrepreneurs choose to scale their solutions while others do not. Research on scaling has generally focused on organizational characteristics often overlooking factors at the individual level that may affect scaling decisions. Drawing on the multidimensional construct of moral intensity, we propose a theoretical model of ethical decision making to explain why a social entrepreneur’s perception of moral intensity of the social problem, coupled with their personal desire for control, can significantly influence scaling decisions. Specifically, we propose that higher levels of perceived moral intensity will positively influence the likelihood of scaling through open as opposed to closed modes in order to achieve greater speed and scope of social impact. However, we also propose this effect will be negatively moderated by a social entrepreneur’s higher levels of desire for control. Our model has implications for research and practice at the interface of ethics and social entrepreneurship.