Publications Database
Welcome to the new Schulich Peer-Reviewed Publication Database!
The database is currently in beta-testing and will be updated with more features as time goes on. In the meantime, stakeholders are free to explore our faculty’s numerous works. The left-hand panel affords the ability to search by the following:
- Faculty Member’s Name;
- Area of Expertise;
- Whether the Publication is Open-Access (free for public download);
- Journal Name; and
- Date Range.
At present, the database covers publications from 2012 to 2020, but will extend further back in the future. In addition to listing publications, the database includes two types of impact metrics: Altmetrics and Plum. The database will be updated annually with most recent publications from our faculty.
If you have any questions or input, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Search Results
Lilian Ng, Pouyan Foroughi and Hosein Hamisheh Bahar (Forthcoming). "Environmental Violations in the Power Sector: Accountability and Community Welfare", Journal of Business Ethics.
Lilian Ng, Amir Akbari, Man Duy (Marty) Pham, and Jing Yu (Forthcoming). "The Real Effects of Protecting Biodiversity", The Review of Finance’s Special Issue on Biodiversity and Natural Resource Finance.
Yelena Larkin and Yaniv Grinstein (Forthcoming). "Corporate Environmental Footprint and Product Market Competition", Journal of Financial Intermediation.
SN. Krylov, SM. Krylova, An Le, SM Moghadas, A Mawani, N Tabatabaei, M Papagelis, P Tsasis, ME Wiktorowicz, RS Rosenbau (Forthcoming). "A Policy Roadmap for Sustainable Mass-Testing", Health Affairs Scholar.
Abstract
Population-wide mass testing with affordable self-tests can drastically reduce lives lost and minimize economic and societal costs during pandemics, especially if deployed before vaccines. During COVID-19, however, the development of self-test manufacturing and distribution capacity lagged behind vaccine rollout and was dismantled once surges subsided, returning us to a pre-pandemic state. As no new capacity has since been secured, future mass testing would again face costly delays. To mitigate this risk, we propose a policy roadmap for an economically viable mass-testing system that can be sustained between crises and rapidly scaled during emergencies. Public investment in R&D to improve the sensitivity of affordable self-tests—not to achieve a single benchmark, but to advance point-of-need (PoN) technologies across medical and non-medical applications—is essential. Improved sensitivity would enable new uses in routine health screening, food safety, and environmental monitoring, generating steady demand and production capacity that can expand as needed. This demand would support a robust system anchored by four mutually reinforcing pillars: scalable manufacturing, real-time data infrastructure, predictive analytics, and sustainable financing. Prioritizing sensitivity can transform mass testing from a reactive measure into a durable public health foundation.Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Devine, R. A., Hideg, I., Holmes, R. M., Lamont, B. T., & Lam, J. Y. (Forthcoming). "Mind the Gap: A Psychological and Structural Perspective on Activist Shareholders’ Targeting of Women CEOs", Journal of Management.
Charles H. Cho, Ewelina Zarzycka, Chaoyuan She, Dorota Dobija, Joanna Krasodomska, Joel Bothello (Forthcoming). "Examining stakeholder reactions to corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from social media", European Management Journal.
Abstract
What corporate behaviors are perceived as irresponsible by different stakeholders? How do such stakeholders react once they perceive irresponsibility? Using the literature on corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR), stakeholder theory and attribution theory, we examined a database of 100 000 social media posts on Twitter/X about Nestlé and H&M in the period 2015–2016. We found that the behavior of these two companies was perceived as irresponsible insofar as it caused direct harm to different stakeholder groups (stakeowners, stakeseekers, stakekeepers and stakewatchers). However, while stakeowners and stakeseekers were more likely to voice their concerns, they tended to voice their concerns only once. In contrast, stakewatchers and stakekeepers were more persistent in voicing concerns. In terms of goals, stakeowners and stakekeepers were more likely to advocate for information dissemination and community building than stakewatchers and stakeseekers, who were more likely to call for action. Our study therefore contributes to the CSiR and stakeholder engagement literature by illustrating how different stakeholder groups use social media to engage with firms perceived as irresponsible.Veresiu, Ela and Marie-Agnes Parmentier (Forthcoming). "Building Age-Inclusive Brands: The Case of 19/99 Beauty", Special Issue of the Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Jennifer Takhar, Anna Schneider-Kamp, Vitor Lima, and Russell Belk (Forthcoming). "The Revolution is Here: Thinking Through Health Technology Capabilisation", Recherche et Applications en Marketing.
Samuel K. Bonsu, Russell W. Belk and Fadwa Chaker (Forthcoming). "Redemptive Materialism: Consumption Practices in Contemporary African Pentecostalism", Consumption and Society.
Estrin, S., Herrmann, A.M., Lévesque, M., Mickiewicz, T. and M. Sanders. (Forthcoming). "New Venture Creation: Modelling Uncertainty and the role of Proprietary Resources", Small Business Economic.
