Publications Database

Welcome to the new Schulich Peer-Reviewed Publication Database!

The database is currently in beta-testing and will be updated with more features as time goes on. In the meantime, stakeholders are free to explore our faculty’s numerous works. The left-hand panel affords the ability to search by the following:

  • Faculty Member’s Name;
  • Area of Expertise;
  • Whether the Publication is Open-Access (free for public download);
  • Journal Name; and
  • Date Range.

At present, the database covers publications from 2012 to 2020, but will extend further back in the future. In addition to listing publications, the database includes two types of impact metrics: Altmetrics and Plum. The database will be updated annually with most recent publications from our faculty.

If you have any questions or input, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.

 

Search Results

Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Johnston, D. A. (2023). "Get Ready for the Next Supply Disruption", Sloan Management Review, 64(2), 60-65.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for companies to improve their supply chain resilience. A poll conducted by the MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics found that only 16% of organizations had an emergency response center in place, which is crucial for mitigating disruptions in the flow of goods. To address this, companies need to develop capabilities to manage supply disruptions, including the ability to anticipate, diagnose, detect, activate resources, protect against, and track threats. These capabilities, known as the ADDAPT framework, help companies understand the causes and effects of disruptions and enable them to respond and prevent future disruptions. Here, Rungtusanatham and Johnston provide insights from Loblaw, Canada's largest supermarket chain, as a case study and outline actions companies can take to develop these capabilities. By mastering the ADDAPT framework, companies can better manage supply disruptions and minimize their impact on critical relationships.

A. Crane and D. Matten (2021). "COVID-19 and the Future of CSR Research", Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 280-284.

Open Access Download

Abstract Research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) flourished pre-COVD-19 and could reasonably claim to be one of the most widely read and cited sub-fields of management. However, the pandemic has clearly challenged a number of existing CSR assumptions, concepts, and practices. We aim to identify four key areas where CSR research has been challenged by COVID-19 – stakeholders, societal risk, supply chain responsibility, and the political economy of CSR – and propose how future CSR research should be realigned to tackle them.

Payne, J. and Tan, J. (2015). "Multiple Levels of Trust and Interfirm Dependence On Supply Chain Coordination: A Framework for Analysis", Creating and Delivering Value in Marketing Developments in Marketing Science, 122-128.

View Paper

Abstract Several activities are required for successful supply chain management. One key activity is the coordination that takes place between firms in a supply chain. Two antecedents to coordinative behavior of firm A with firm B in a supply chain is the trust that firm A has in firm B (interorganizational trust) and firm A’s dependence on firm B (interorganizational dependence). In addition, this paper includes the interpersonal trust of key boundary-spanning employees from firm B by key boundary-spanning employees from firm A (interpersonal trust). We posit that the interorganizational trust mediates interpersonal trust with the outcome of interfirm coordination yet also serves as moderator of the impact of interorganizational dependence on coordination.