Publications Database

Welcome to the new Schulich Peer-Reviewed Publication Database!

The database is currently in beta-testing and will be updated with more features as time goes on. In the meantime, stakeholders are free to explore our faculty’s numerous works. The left-hand panel affords the ability to search by the following:

  • Faculty Member’s Name;
  • Area of Expertise;
  • Whether the Publication is Open-Access (free for public download);
  • Journal Name; and
  • Date Range.

At present, the database covers publications from 2012 to 2020, but will extend further back in the future. In addition to listing publications, the database includes two types of impact metrics: Altmetrics and Plum. The database will be updated annually with most recent publications from our faculty.

If you have any questions or input, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.

 

Search Results

Dean Neu, Elizabeth Ocampo, Leiser Silva (2023). "Critical accounting research in Mesoamerica: Accountable to whom?", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 93, 102598.

Open Access Download

Abstract This commentary is a response to a recent article by Gómez-Villegas and Larrinaga: an article that uses some of our previously published research to argue that the [further] opening of the Latin American critical accounting research communities will lead to a renewed colonization of local knowledges. Our commentary concurs that there is a very real risk that academic publishing processes will exacerbate the colonization of academic knowledge production in the South. At the same time, we suggest that Gómez-Villegas and Larrinaga’s focus on the research activities of individual scholars is misplaced since it is the commercial activities of large, academic publishers that are driving these colonization processes. Furthermore, we propose that the authors’ analysis perpetuates a Ladino version of internal colonialism where indigenous peoples and other marginalized communities are simultaneously erased yet represented as ignorant and unable to think. We conclude by affirming Rigoberta Menchú’s statement that the only way to confront injustice and advocate for positive social change is to work collectively and to fight against all forms of neocolonial practices.

Veresiu, E. and Giesler, M. (2018). "Beyond Acculturation: Multiculturalism and the Institutional Shaping of an Ethnic Consumer Subject", Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 553-570.

View Paper

Abstract Prior consumer research has investigated the consumer behavior, identity work, and sources of ethnic group conflict among various immigrants and indigenes. However, by continuing to focus on consumers’ lived experiences, researchers lack theoretical clarity on the institutional shaping of these individuals as ethnic consumers, which has important implications for sustaining neocolonial power imbalances between colonized (immigrant-sending) and colonizing (immigrant-receiving) cultures. We bring sociological theories of neoliberal governmentality and multiculturalism to bear on an in-depth analysis of the contemporary Canadian marketplace to reveal our concept of market-mediated multiculturation, which we define as an institutional mechanism for attenuating ethnic group conflicts through which immigrant-receiving cultures fetishize strangers and their strangeness in their commodification of differences, and the existence of inequalities between ethnicities is occluded. Specifically, our findings unpack four interrelated consumer socialization strategies (envisioning, exemplifying, equipping, and embodying) through which institutional actors across different fields (politics, market research, retail, and consumption) shape an ethnic consumer subject. We conclude with a critical discussion of extant scholarship on consumer acculturation as being complicit in sustaining entrenched colonialist biases.